This got us thinking about how so often, the movies that win Best Picture and things like that are obscure, R rated films that are full of violence, sex and profanity. Sometimes I wonder if "the critics" just loved to be shocked, and love to see awful things put on screen because it's "artistic" or "innovative." Well, I disagree. I think that movies can lack the shock factor, lack nudity and profanity and still be great movies.
P.S. I have no idea why they put Taylor Swift in this movie - it's nothing but distracting. I also think it's probably just for the publicity. Which is ridiculous. Also, every time I see a poster for The Giver with Taylor's face on it it drives me crazy because she was literally in it for like 2 minutes!
Anyways, yay for beautiful movies that make you feel good about life!! (And for posters that actually show the main characters in a movie).
I still need to seed this one! Glad to hear you liked it!
ReplyDeleteAnd yeah, I don't usually use Rotten Tomatoes; I agree with you about the "artistic" thing - good movies don't HAVE to have shock value!
That's funny about the Taylor Swift thing, I don't really care for her, and am sad to here that she's so distracting. I can't wait to see the film myself; however, I completely agree. I stopped looking up Rotten Tomatoes when then gave some crazy reviews about one film my whole family appreciated - everyone's a critic and that site doesn't help distinguish between common analysis and utter rude and foolishly misdirected assaults of verbal jealousy/diarrhea. Thanks again though for your own helpful and appropriate critique :-)
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you commented on this movie. It looked like a good one and so I think I'll go out and see it in the next couple days. Thanks
ReplyDelete